The Plant Cell 23: 2045-2063 (2011)
|
A Guideline to Family-wide Comparative State-of-the-art qRT-PCR Analysis Exemplified with a Brassicaceae Cross-species Seed Germination Case Study [W][OA]
|
Kai Graeber*, Ada Linkies*, Andrew T.A. Wood, Gerhard Leubner-Metzger
* Both authors contributed equally to this work
|
University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Institute for Biology II, Botany / Plant Physiology, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany, Web: 'The Seed Biology Place' http://www.seedbiology.de (K.G., A.L., G.L.-M.)
The University of Nottingham, Division of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom (A.T.A.W.)
Received February 8, 2011; revised May 6, 2011; accepted May 27, 2011; published June 10, 2011.
www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.111.084103
|
Table 3. Factors Influencing PCR Efficiency as Determined by ANOVA F-Tests on
Efficiencies Obtained from 687 qRT-PCR Reactions of Lepidium sativum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Factora |
Degrees of Freedom |
F-valueb |
Approximate
Z-valuec |
R2 d |
Adjusted R2 e |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time |
4 |
13.03 |
5.98 |
0.071 |
0.066 |
Tissue |
2 |
67.92 |
9.57 |
0.166 |
0.163 |
Treatment |
1 |
20.48 |
4.15 |
0.029 |
0.028 |
Sample |
59 |
2.48 |
5.83 |
0.190 |
0.113 |
Replicate |
14 |
10.00 |
9.29 |
0.172 |
0.155 |
Gene |
11 |
90.75 |
24.72 |
0.597 |
0.590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Dependence of PCR efficiency on different
multi-level factors was tested. Corresponding to Figure 3 these factors are
time in hours (0, 8, 18, 30, 96), tissue (CAP, RAD, CAP&RAD), treatment
(CON, ABA), individual sample, biological replicates and the amplified gene.
b F-values were obtained by testing the
linear model for PCR efficiency with each factor included individually
against the null model which includes the constant term only.
c The approximate Z-values were obtained by
applying the Wilson-Hilferty cube-root normalising transformation to the
F-values and then standardising, noting that because the denominator degrees
of freedom is large in each case, the theoretical F distribution is
effectively a scaled X2 distribution.
The approximate Z-values of different factors can be more directly
compared than F-values. Larger Z-values indicate higher importance of a
factor in explaining PCR efficiency variation.
d R2 is the square of the
correlation between the observed PCR efficiency values and the fitted values
under each model. A value close to 1 corresponds to a high level of
agreement between the fitted model and the observed values.
e Adjusted R2 is defined in
similar fashion to R2 but tends to be smaller than R2 when
the model has a large number of parameters, as is the case with the factor
Sample. The table shows that the amplified gene is by some way the most
important factor in explaining PCR efficiency variation in our dataset. We
have not reported p-values as all were very small (less than 10-6 in all cases and less than 10-16 in some cases) and therefore are
not useful for comparing the importance of the different factors. |
Synopsis: Developmental processes like seed germination are characterised by massive transcriptome changes. This study compares seed transcriptome datasets of different Brassicaceae to identify stable expressed reference genes for cross-species qRT-PCR normalisation. A workflow is presented for improving RNA quality, qRT-PCR performance, and normalisation when analysing expression changes across species.
|
|
|